This tool is considered as authentic, because it is more recent than those of Portugal that we will discuss below and found in Atapuerca. No matter if it's just as "primitive" has not been alone. There published more than 60 references to human remains or human activity remains uncertain, much older than the first Australopithecus. When I say older, I want to speak for millions of years, it is preferable and less equivocal about traditional stories citing the geological ages, than to number of years.
is certain that among all this information, there will be fraud, but a single reference to true, the whole edifice of human evolution is dissipates like a smoke screen (which is what it is).
· THE FINDINGS OF CARLOS RIBEIRO:
In 1860, Professor Carlos Ribeiro responsible for the Geological Survey of Portugal, carried out excavations in the valley of the Tagus estuary near Lisbon. Land found in Miocene [1] a collection of primitive tools of flint and quartzite (which seems to be, are still preserved in the Museum of History Natural de Lisboa). [2]
Ribeiro, was not the only tool that remains found in Miocene, also the French archaeologist Louis Bourgeois found them in Thenay (France). [3]
In Asia, Fritz Noetling geological research department of India, stone tools found in Miocene strata in Burma. [4]
Arriving evolutionary thrust the years, some anthropologists, such as Delgado Neri, successor in office of Carlos Ribeiro, denied the authenticity of the findings, saying that both in Portugal and France, and also in India, the tools were built alone, and spontaneous fractures produced by the weather. [5]
not matter at all that the French anthropologist's Gabriel Mortillet, described the discovery of the skeleton of a modern man in the Miocene of the Midi French. [6]
currently seems to be attracting the interest in these investigations. [7]
So much for that evolutionists can digest, modern men and tools, more than six million years, what to do with the rivers of ink have been spent?.
· THE SKELETONS Lagoa Santa:
Danish archaeologist, Peter Wilhelm Lund, excavated several caves in the area of \u200b\u200bLagoa Santa in Brazil, some of them accompanied by Peter Clausen. Human remains found at 1,850, quite "petrified", together with lithic industry, at the same level had skeletons of extinct animals such as mastodons and giant sloths, with others still living in South America as armadillos and anteaters. One of the skulls found were brought to Denmark.
In 1938, Poch excavated in a nearby cave called Sumidouro, and found, again, human remains and the remains of extinct animals. He gathered the bones that met with Lund at the University of the State in Belo Horizonte. There have been studied by several paleontologists who have found many brands of flesh in the bones of extinct animals. [8]
One of the skulls, with features quite "modern" found by Lund, Melanesian and dolichocephalic with features, has been "dating" in Denmark in 10,000 years by carbon-14 method. [9]
subsequently continued digging in the cave and other close and almost all have found remains of extinct animals with human remains and stone industry of flint, quartzite and quartz. These latest findings are "dated" in 21,000 years by the same method. [10] How
idly dating human remains quite "petrified" [11] by carbon-14 method?. They know perfectly well that this method of "dating" (even accepting that serve for something), does not apply, especially if the remains have been exposed to contamination by fluid flow, let alone in a cave in a limestone massif as the case of Lagoa Santa, in which water flows inevitably fraught with carbonates have to permeate the bones of recent carbon.
And if men are from 10,000 years ago, and giant sloths became extinct at the end of the Pliocene, who fleshing their bones with flint tools?, are the behemoths?.
This is nonsense, but no matter, because they think that this clears vain for evidence that disproves the evolutionary dogma.
That's the issue, continue commenting.
In the area of \u200b\u200bLagoa Santa, besides the aforementioned skulls, and newer and are finding things very curious, such as the skull, it will have to invent a new name for another species. Image: by citguero.
[1] - The Miocene date it currently between 6,000,000 and 22,000,000 years.
[2] - Ribeiro, C. "L'homme Tertiaire in Portugal" - Cong. Int. of Antrop. and Arch. Prehistoric - Lisboa - 1884, p. 81-91.
- Ribeiro, C. "Description of several sizes from Flint and quartzite layers of the land of tertiary and Quaternary basins of the Tagus and Sado. Lisbon "- Real Academia das Ciencias de Lisboa. - 1871.
- Ribeiro, C. "On flints, decuverts Miocene land in Portugal" - Cong. Int. of Antrop. and Arch. Prehistoric - Brussels - 1872. p. 95-100.
- Ribeiro, C. "On the geological position of the Miocene to Pliocene strata of Portugal" - Cong. Int. of Antrop. and Arch. Prehistoric - Brussels - 1872. p. 100-104.
[3] - Bourgeois, L. "On the flint bearing Margues considered a human work and discovered in the field of Miocene Thenay" - Cong. Int. of Antrop. and Arch. Prehistoric - Brussels - 1872. p. 81-92.
[4] - Noetling, F. - "On the ocurrences of chpped In The Upper Miocene flints of Burma" - Records of the Geological Survey of India - 1894 p. 101-103.
[5] - Delgado, JF Neri - "The flint tertiary Otta" - Cong. Int. d'Anthrop. et d'Arch. Préhistoriques - x session - 1889. p. 529 to 533.
[6] - De Mortillet - "Le Préhistorique" - Paris - C. Reinwald.
[7] - Michael A. Cremo - "The Excavations of Carlos Ribeiro" - 2,000 - view. www.mcremo.com.
[8] - When you separate the meat with flint tools, as if done with a knife, leave identifiable marks on the bones.
[9] - Buffetaut, E. Op cit. p. 270 to 271.
[10] - Bagual, Roger. "Lagoa Santa, Man - 1975" Sci Paleo Anthropolology - 12 - 2,005. See also: - Lamping - Emperaire et. al. - 1975 - Bryan - 1978 - Prous - 1,986 .- Beattie and Bryan - 1984.
[11] - means petrification of a bone, some remineralization processes (metasomatism) that take place by movement of carbonate-laden fluids that alter the mineralogical composition of the remains.
is certain that among all this information, there will be fraud, but a single reference to true, the whole edifice of human evolution is dissipates like a smoke screen (which is what it is).
· THE FINDINGS OF CARLOS RIBEIRO:
In 1860, Professor Carlos Ribeiro responsible for the Geological Survey of Portugal, carried out excavations in the valley of the Tagus estuary near Lisbon. Land found in Miocene [1] a collection of primitive tools of flint and quartzite (which seems to be, are still preserved in the Museum of History Natural de Lisboa). [2]
Ribeiro, was not the only tool that remains found in Miocene, also the French archaeologist Louis Bourgeois found them in Thenay (France). [3]
In Asia, Fritz Noetling geological research department of India, stone tools found in Miocene strata in Burma. [4]
Arriving evolutionary thrust the years, some anthropologists, such as Delgado Neri, successor in office of Carlos Ribeiro, denied the authenticity of the findings, saying that both in Portugal and France, and also in India, the tools were built alone, and spontaneous fractures produced by the weather. [5]
not matter at all that the French anthropologist's Gabriel Mortillet, described the discovery of the skeleton of a modern man in the Miocene of the Midi French. [6]
currently seems to be attracting the interest in these investigations. [7]
So much for that evolutionists can digest, modern men and tools, more than six million years, what to do with the rivers of ink have been spent?.
· THE SKELETONS Lagoa Santa:
Danish archaeologist, Peter Wilhelm Lund, excavated several caves in the area of \u200b\u200bLagoa Santa in Brazil, some of them accompanied by Peter Clausen. Human remains found at 1,850, quite "petrified", together with lithic industry, at the same level had skeletons of extinct animals such as mastodons and giant sloths, with others still living in South America as armadillos and anteaters. One of the skulls found were brought to Denmark.
In 1938, Poch excavated in a nearby cave called Sumidouro, and found, again, human remains and the remains of extinct animals. He gathered the bones that met with Lund at the University of the State in Belo Horizonte. There have been studied by several paleontologists who have found many brands of flesh in the bones of extinct animals. [8]
One of the skulls, with features quite "modern" found by Lund, Melanesian and dolichocephalic with features, has been "dating" in Denmark in 10,000 years by carbon-14 method. [9]
subsequently continued digging in the cave and other close and almost all have found remains of extinct animals with human remains and stone industry of flint, quartzite and quartz. These latest findings are "dated" in 21,000 years by the same method. [10] How
idly dating human remains quite "petrified" [11] by carbon-14 method?. They know perfectly well that this method of "dating" (even accepting that serve for something), does not apply, especially if the remains have been exposed to contamination by fluid flow, let alone in a cave in a limestone massif as the case of Lagoa Santa, in which water flows inevitably fraught with carbonates have to permeate the bones of recent carbon.
And if men are from 10,000 years ago, and giant sloths became extinct at the end of the Pliocene, who fleshing their bones with flint tools?, are the behemoths?.
This is nonsense, but no matter, because they think that this clears vain for evidence that disproves the evolutionary dogma.
That's the issue, continue commenting.
In the area of \u200b\u200bLagoa Santa, besides the aforementioned skulls, and newer and are finding things very curious, such as the skull, it will have to invent a new name for another species. Image: by citguero. [1] - The Miocene date it currently between 6,000,000 and 22,000,000 years.
[2] - Ribeiro, C. "L'homme Tertiaire in Portugal" - Cong. Int. of Antrop. and Arch. Prehistoric - Lisboa - 1884, p. 81-91.
- Ribeiro, C. "Description of several sizes from Flint and quartzite layers of the land of tertiary and Quaternary basins of the Tagus and Sado. Lisbon "- Real Academia das Ciencias de Lisboa. - 1871.
- Ribeiro, C. "On flints, decuverts Miocene land in Portugal" - Cong. Int. of Antrop. and Arch. Prehistoric - Brussels - 1872. p. 95-100.
- Ribeiro, C. "On the geological position of the Miocene to Pliocene strata of Portugal" - Cong. Int. of Antrop. and Arch. Prehistoric - Brussels - 1872. p. 100-104.
[3] - Bourgeois, L. "On the flint bearing Margues considered a human work and discovered in the field of Miocene Thenay" - Cong. Int. of Antrop. and Arch. Prehistoric - Brussels - 1872. p. 81-92.
[4] - Noetling, F. - "On the ocurrences of chpped In The Upper Miocene flints of Burma" - Records of the Geological Survey of India - 1894 p. 101-103.
[5] - Delgado, JF Neri - "The flint tertiary Otta" - Cong. Int. d'Anthrop. et d'Arch. Préhistoriques - x session - 1889. p. 529 to 533.
[6] - De Mortillet - "Le Préhistorique" - Paris - C. Reinwald.
[7] - Michael A. Cremo - "The Excavations of Carlos Ribeiro" - 2,000 - view. www.mcremo.com.
[8] - When you separate the meat with flint tools, as if done with a knife, leave identifiable marks on the bones.
[9] - Buffetaut, E. Op cit. p. 270 to 271.
[10] - Bagual, Roger. "Lagoa Santa, Man - 1975" Sci Paleo Anthropolology - 12 - 2,005. See also: - Lamping - Emperaire et. al. - 1975 - Bryan - 1978 - Prous - 1,986 .- Beattie and Bryan - 1984.
[11] - means petrification of a bone, some remineralization processes (metasomatism) that take place by movement of carbonate-laden fluids that alter the mineralogical composition of the remains.
Semogil May 10, 2010.
0 comments:
Post a Comment